Who can serve on the “ethics” commission?

From what I’ve heard, there is a lot that is good in the “ethics” initiative.
Shouldn’t we just pass it? Isn’t it better than nothing?

Why is the "Government Ethics Reform" initiative's “ethics” commission problematic?

How would the "Government Ethics Reform" initiative become law?

What’s so problematic about the ethics initiative’s disclosure requirements?

Why are some people opposed to the ethics initiative’s prohibition on legislators
working as lobbyists while they serve?

Can the "ethics" initiative’s constitutionality be seriously challenged? If so, why
would the Lieutenant Governor allow it to be circulated?

How much will this "ethics" initiative cost Utah taxpayers?

What are the motives of the "ethics" initiative sponsors?

What’s the entire process by which members of the "ethics" commission are
selected?

How much would the "ethics" commission get paid?

How does the proposed "ethics" initiative redefine a lobbyist?

Who is designated to oversee the "ethics" commission?

What if I’ve already signed the petition to put the "Government Ethics Reform" initiative on Utah's ballot?

What process would the "ethics" commission follow in handling a complaint
against a legislator?

I’ve heard that if this "Government Ethics Reform" initiative passes, accused legislators will be presumed guilty until they can prove their innocence. Is that true?

Why can’t the legislature just fix the problems with the "Government Ethics Reform" initiative after it passes?

If the “ethics” commission finds a legislator guilty, happens next?

What are the duties of the proposed “ethics” commission?

Why would anyone be opposed to prohibiting legislators from issuing
threats?

What is Utahns for Ethical Government's "Government Ethics Reform" initiative?